The Storage Cost Equation Gets a New Variable

When Lazard dropped its 2017 Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS) analysis, the energy sector collectively leaned in. Why? Because suddenly we had a Rosetta Stone for comparing apples-to-oranges storage solutions. Imagine trying to compare a Tesla Powerpack with pumped hydro – it's like debating whether a sprinter or marathon runner is "better." The LCOS framework finally gave us common ground.

Breaking Down the Storage Buffet

The report served up a smorgasbord of technologies:

• Lithium-ion batteries clocking in at $285-$580/MWh
• Pumped hydro flexing its $165-$265/MWh range
• Flow batteries playing the wildcard at $350-$720/MWh

But here's the kicker – these numbers weren't just price tags. They accounted for the whole lifecycle circus: installation costs doing the trapeze act, maintenance crews juggling expenses, and efficiency rates walking the tightrope of real-world performance.

The Invisible Hand of Storage Economics

Lazard's analysis revealed some plot twists worthy of a energy thriller:

• Lithium-ion's "Moore's Law" moment – costs dropping faster than a mic at a rap battle
• Pumped hydro's "grandpa tech" advantage – still unbeatable for bulk storage
• Flow batteries' identity crisis – great for duration, terrible at instant response

Our favorite revelation? The "100-cycle rule" – if your storage solution can't handle at least 100 full cycles annually, you might as well be burning dollar bills for warmth.

Real-World Math: California's Storage Gambit

Take Southern California's 2017 storage procurement frenzy. Utilities were crunching LCOS numbers like Wall Street quants:

• 4-hour lithium systems became the MVP for duck curve management
• Pumped hydro got sidelined by permitting red tape (despite better LCOS)
• Flow batteries scored niche wins in renewable integration projects

The lesson? LCOS doesn't operate in a policy vacuum – regulatory speed bumps can derail even the most cost-effective solutions.

The Ghosts of Storage Past (and Future)

While the 2017 data shows lithium-ion at $285/MWh, fast-forward to today and we're flirting with sub-$100/MWh territories. But here's the million-dollar question: will emerging technologies like compressed air storage or hydrogen fuel cells repeat lithium's cost plunge?

The report's crystal ball section (okay, technically the sensitivity analysis) suggested three game-changers:

1. Material science breakthroughs
2. Manufacturing scale-up
3. Regulatory risk reduction

As one industry wag put it, "Storage economics is like teenage romance – exciting, unpredictable, and someone's always getting burned."

Download Lazard's 2017 Levelized Cost of Energy Storage Analysis: Decoding the Economics of Grid-Scale Solutions [PDF]

Visit our Blog to read more articles