Why Energy Storage Became Washington's New Darling

Picture this: a technology that could store sunshine for rainy days and bottle wind gusts for calm nights. That's the promise that brought together solar lobbyists and climate hawks in 2019 around the Energy Storage Tax Incentive and Deployment Act (HR 2096). This legislative effort aimed to rewrite the rules for energy storage financing, proposing to extend the 30% federal Investment Tax Credit (ITC) to standalone storage systems – something previously reserved for solar installations.

The Storage Gold Rush That Almost Was

The bill's architects envisioned a marketplace where:

• Battery projects could compete with natural gas "peaker" plants on cost
• Utilities would pair storage with renewables instead of fossil backups
• Emerging technologies like flow batteries could scale up

Energy analysts projected the legislation could spark $3 billion in private investment within a decade. But like many promising climate bills, it got stuck in committee limbo. The storage industry found itself in regulatory purgatory – too crucial to ignore, yet not important enough to warrant its own tax breaks.

The Ripple Effects of Legislative Gridlock

While HR 2096 never crossed the finish line, its ghost continues to shape today's energy landscape. Consider the case of New Jersey's 20MW Montague project – completed in 2025 after navigating a maze of state incentives and federal ITC workarounds. Developers had to:

1. Pair batteries with solar panels (even when unnecessary)
2. Dance around IRS rules about "dual-use" systems
3. Hire tax attorneys instead of engineers for crucial design decisions

Silver Linings in the Cloud of Uncertainty

Paradoxically, this regulatory headache sparked innovation. The market saw:

• Hybrid systems combining multiple storage technologies
• Creative financing models like tax credit transfers
• State-level incentives filling federal gaps (see California's 80MW Bottleneck project)

The New Frontier: Domestic Manufacturing Meets Storage

Fast forward to 2025 – the Inflation Reduction Act's domestic content rules are reshaping the playing field. To claim maximum ITC benefits, developers now need:

• US-made battery cells (currently only 8% meet this bar)
• Domestic engineering services
• American-made balance-of-system components

This "Made in America" push creates both challenges and opportunities. While domestic battery production has surged 300% since 2022, quality control issues and supply chain bottlenecks persist. The recent 45X tax credit controversy shows how quickly policy can impact markets – some manufacturers now stockpile components like battery-grade lithium to hedge against regulatory changes.

Lessons from the Policy Rollercoaster

The storage sector's journey offers crucial insights for clean energy advocates:

• Tax credits alone don't guarantee adoption – project permitting remains a hurdle
• Technology-neutral policies often create unintended consequences
• State vs federal incentives can create a patchwork of opportunities

As utilities increasingly pair storage with offshore wind and next-gen nuclear, the original vision of HR 2096 keeps evolving. The market now demands solutions that combine ITC eligibility with black start capability and grid-forming features – requirements that didn't exist when the bill was drafted.

Download Unlocking the Potential of Energy Storage: A Deep Dive into the 2019 Tax Incentive Push [PDF]

Visit our Blog to read more articles